Stolen Motherhood
Surrogacy and Made-to-Order Children
-
- $17.99
-
- $17.99
Publisher Description
Neither marginal nor secret, contracting surrogate mothers is growing rapidly and is regarded as socially progressive. Yet the “process” is vitiated from the get go, i.e., commissioning a woman to bear, birth, and surrender a baby.
Surrogacy undermines a woman’s human dignity. It makes her an instrument in other people’s project and attacks her equal gender rights. It also objectivizes and denies the rights of the child to be born.
Countries that have adopted a fait accompli approach (simply regulating) have seen people, coached by shrewd international brokers, go “international.” That only means the surrogate mother is from a poor country with lax legislation while the commissioning parents are from a rich one.
By examining the “surrogacy process” and all its implications, Maria De Koninck reaches the conclusion that the best way forward is an international ban on surrogacy.
Maria De Koninck (PhD) was Université Laval’s first Chair of Women’s Studies. Her research has focused on women’s health, including childbirth and reproductive technologies. Her 20 years of international experience include work on HIV-AIDS in West Africa and maternal mortality (notably for WHO). She lives in Quebec City.
Arielle Aaronson is a Montreal translator with degrees from Concordia and McGill. She has translated both fiction and nonfiction for all audiences.
Excerpt
“A human can never be a means to an end. Surrogacy is not socially legitimate, especially considering how much women have fought for centuries—particularly since the 19th century—to be recognized as persons in their own right, capable of performing the same functions as a man and not confined to reproductive roles (childbirth, caregiving, domestic work). (…) Legalizing a practice that subjects some of them to fulfilling a reproductive role for the sole purpose of satisfying sponsors is unacceptable in this context.” (p. 144)
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Sociologist De Koninck delivers a harsh critique of human surrogacy based on the argument that it jeopardizes gender equality and human rights by treating women and children as property. De Koninck argues that the experience of pregnancy makes one a mother, even if "she has not conceived the child she's carrying and has no relationship to the father." As evidence, she cites the cellular connection to the baby during its growth and the child's experiences before and immediately after birth. Though she acknowledges studies showing that some women who become surrogates for financial reasons report overall satisfaction with the process, De Konick calls for a end to human surrogacy. However, the few negative examples she provides, including a couple who refused to take a baby with Down syndrome, are outliers. Though she raises some meaningful questions about wealthy couples commodifying poor women, De Koninck's claim that surrogacy without financial incentives is equally problematic falls flat, as does her argument that surrogacy is a step along the way to "completely eliminating the mother from the equation." This ill-reasoned takedown misses the mark.